O genezie „cielesnych” motywów w twórczości Mariny Cwietajewej
2017, 10, No. 1
University of Warsaw, Faculty of Applied Linguistics and East Slavic Philology
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 340 KB
Number of views:117
Number of downloads:19
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
It is difficult to form a coherent conception of Marina Tsvetaeva’s considerations about the body, as sometimes they contradict each other and sometimes they complement each other. However, they were changing as new experiences were accumulated. From the idea that the body is like a wall or an obstacle in the way, Tsvetaeva moves to the idea of the body as a separate zone of her personality, where freedom and democracy go along with subjection, and where the rigorous part of the personality – soul is to be subdued. When the poet starts to lose contact with the body, when she becomes convinced that she no longer can identify with it, she experiences a stormy passion in which she hopes to complete her own incarnation. However, she comes to the conclusion that the nature of her body is flawed and the signs of gender are not proper. She consciously resigns from love, claiming that love and creativity cannot be reconciled. Her body bothers her, it seems to cast a veil on the true reality, which is invisible and “by which one thinks”. After another period of her soul and body disassociation, she comes to the conclusion that she did not know her body at all.
Keywords:
Bibliography
Цветаева М., Неизданное. Записные книжки в 2–х тт., Москва 2001.
Цветаева М., Неизданное. Сводные тетради, Москва 1997.
Цветаева М., Письма. 1905–1923, Москва 2012.
Цветаева М., Письма. 1923–1927, Москва 2013.
Цветаева М., Собрание сочинений в 7-ми томах, Москва 1994.
Слоним М., Марина Цветаева, „Руски архив” 1929, nr 4, [w:] Марина Цветаева в критике современников, в 2-х тт., Москва 2003.
Топоров В., О „психофизиологическом” компоненте поэзии Мандельштама, [w:] В. Топоров, Миф. Ритуал. Символ. Образ. Исследования в области мифо- поэтического, Москвa 1995.
Топоров В., Пространство и текст, [w:] Текст. Семантика и структура, Т. Цивьян (red.), Москва 1983.
Toporow W., Rzecz w perspektywie antropologicznej. Apologia Puszkina, [w:] W. Toporow,Przestrzeń i rzecz, Kraków 2003.
Other articles from the issue
- the Visegrad Groupageing populationdemography
Problemy demograficzne krajów Grupy Wyszehradzkiej – analiza porównawcza
Edyta Chwiej
- VilniusPolish-Lithuanian conflictPolish-Lithuanian negotiations in Konigsberg
Echa polsko-litewskich rokowań w Królewcu w 1928 roku w litewskiej i polskiej prasie i dyplomacji
Joanna Kozłowska
- PolandBelarusnational minoritymemorial sitescultural heritage
Świadectwa polskiej kultury na Białorusi
Klaudia Soboń
Similar publications
12.12.2024
Marina TsvetaevaelementmotifmetaphorisationRussian poetryПОЭТ И СТИХИЯ: ФУНКЦИОНАЛЬНО-СЕМАНТИЧЕСКИЙ АНАЛИЗ ЛЕКСЕМЫ «СТИХИЯ» В ТВОРЧЕСТВЕ МАРИНЫ ЦВЕТАЕВОЙ
Elena Janczuk
06.11.2018
Marina Tsvetaevamotivedeathlife„Metafizyka” życia Mariny Cwietajewej
Elena Janczuk
22.11.2021
Marina TsvetaevaNatalia GoncharovaMartin HeideggerPaul GauguinVasily Rozanovpaintingmodernismavant-gardeontologyekphrasisМодернистский экфрасис в эссе Марины Цветаевой „Наталья Гончарова. Жизнь и творчество”
Alexander Medvedev
